California Debt Collector Harassment

The
Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act
(FDCPA)

was established in 1978 by the
Federal
Trade Commission (FTC)

to protect and ensure fair debt collection practices. Along with the
federal FDCPA, different states in the United States of America have
different laws like the FDCPA. California too has its laws which are
commonly referred to as the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act (RFDCPA). The RFDCPA protects debtors from
California
debt collector harassment
.

Private
litigants like the Krohn & Moss.
Consumer
Law Center

Top Five Violations of the FDCPA

Krohn & Moss Ltd. handles thousands of cases a year but despite the massive numbers of people we assist each year, the type of complaints we receive about debt collectors are almost exclusively limited to five types of complaints.

The most common complaint is excessive phone calls. There is no rule as to the number of times a debt collector may call you. Whether calling crosses the line and becomes illegal depends on the specific circumstances of each case. The pattern of calls as opposed to the volume of calls is usually how courts determine if a debt collector has violated the law. For example, a debt collector can call a consumer sixty times over six months, and that is probably not illegal if the calls are evenly spaced over that period (10 calls a month or about 2-3 calls a week). However, if a debt collector called ten times in one day that certainly would be a violation. Generally, the more concentrated the calls the more likely the debt collector has broken the law. It is important to document the calls by writing or typing the date, time and number calling because debt collectors always deny claims of excessive calls and phone records may not show all the calls.

Disclosure of information about the debt to a third party is the second most common violation. This occurs when debt collectors call friends, relatives or co-workers attempting to speak with the consumer. Unless the consumer consents to the disclosure of the information or the third party is a spouse, this is absolutely illegal.

Failure by the debt collector to identify itself as a debt collector and that it is calling about a debt is the next most common violation. This usually occurs when a debt collector leaves a voicemail message. It is vital to save these messages as the debt collector will always deny that it failed to comply with this notification requirement.

Threats of legal action (lawsuit, wage garnishment, liens, etc.) are very common violations but are only violations if they debt collector does not intend to take such action (or cannot legally take such action). Debt collectors are permitted to sue, garnish wages after a judgment and other such action but the unintended threat is illegal because it is a deceptive practice. These violations can be hard to detect because a debt collector’s intentions may not be known at the time of the threat. However, since we have handled cases against every major debt collection company in the country as well as hundreds of smaller ones, we know which debt collectors intend such threats and which are just bluffing.

Finally, the fifth most common violation is calls to a consumer’s place of employment. However, this is a violation only if the debt collector knows or has reason to know the calls are prohibited and the employer actually prohibits such calls. Generally, it is necessary for the consumer to advise the debt collector that such calls are prohibited before a violation occurs. Once the debt collector is notified, any subsequent calls are a violation of federal law.

Report on the Collection Industry

The Federal Trade Commission recently released its annual report on the collection industry, and it is no surprise the industry continues to struggle with compliance. The debt collection industry received more complaints than any other industry. The FTC received 140,036 complaints in 2010 of violation of various laws include the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. This total was more than ¼ of ALL complaints received by the FTC. Clearly, this is an industry that has no intention of complying with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the law instituted by Congress to protect consumers from deceptive and harassing collection practices.

This begs the question, is the government taking any steps to further help consumers? Well, we will see with the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau – a new agency created by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of July 2010. This agency will work alongside the FTC in protecting the rights of consumers. Much like the FTC, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will be entrusted to shape and create debt collection rules and regulations and field complaints by consumers.

Debt Collection Harassment on Facebook


Many debt collection cases now spring from Social Media sites and the most popular of these is Facebook. These social media sites are an excuse to obtain information about consumers who debt collectors are probably not able to reach.

Since there is no way to find out if the person who sent you a friend request is sending with a genuine interest you accept the friend request in all innocence. Debt collectors lie in order to become your friends. Last year there were two cases where consumers complained of debt collectors harassing them by communicating through their Facebook accounts.

In a recent case in Mid West, a consumer received a request to be friends with a woman's photograph in the profile. Debtor accepted this request in all earnestness and faced terrible outcome when the collectors posted a message on his wall – “ Pay your debts.”

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) came into existence in 1978 to address the many complaints the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was receiving about debt collection harassment. The FDCPA laws did not have a provision for Facebook as at that time nobody even knew about social media sites. However, in the Facebook or other social media site cases a new appellate law has to find place.

In a recent social media case, an Orlando court ruled that a debt collector used Facebook to unlawfully harass a debtor. The Orlando court did not change its decision though the debt collector argued that social media sites are not covered under the FDCPA. This is a very important issue and needs to be addressed on a countrywide basis.

Some debt collection agencies have also violated the FDCPA by disclosing the debt to all of the debtors' friends in his Facebook list of friends openly by posting on the debtors' walls. In Florida, a debt collector used Facebook to tell debtor's family and friends to have her call him for a debt she owed.

The misuse of social media sites is a new method in debt collection harassment. By using false identity, disclosing information to debtors' friends and family and publicly shaming a consumer, debt collectors face charges under the FDCPA. Though the FDCPA does not have a provision for Facebook, violations of the Act are very clear when debt collectors reach debtors through a social media site plainly to harass him.

Some Collection agencies which use Facebook and other social networking sites in order to reach borrowers have identified themselves. Once debt collectors become your friends they invade your inner circles and find out about your wealth. If you declare you do not have funds but have photos displayed on your Facebook with a show of wealth, they would make an issue out of this this and ask you to pay up.

Debt Collection Harassment Complaints on The Increase

Once again debt related complaints top the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) list in 2010. In a debt collection case, one of the major collection agencies, West Asset Management has been slapped a penalty of $ 2.8 million. This is the largest civil penalty ever won by the FTC in a debt settlement case, to settle charges that the collection agency violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) when attempting to collect debt from consumers.

Per the FTC record of the debt collection harassment complaints, a case (http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0723006/110316wamcmpt.pdf) was filed against West Asset Management Inc., that has 1500 employees in 13 states and one offshore location. This agency's debt collectors allegedly violated the FDCPA laws. Their debt collectors called consumers many times everyday, sometimes for accounts that did not belong to those consumers.

West Asset Management also disclosed the existence of consumers' debt to third parties and did not take cognizance of consumers' written demands asking West Asset Management to stop calling them.

The FDCPA requires the third party debt collectors engaged by collection agencies or creditors to follow certain guidelines. The FDCPA guidelines clearly state what a debt collector should not do.

  • Debt collectors should not:
  • Call you at inconvenient times
  • Use improper/abusive language during the call
  • Give misleading information such as wrong name or false identity as an attorney
  • Disclose your debt to third parties except the one acceptable to you or your attorney
  • Demand more money than the actual debt
  • Call you after you have sent a written request
  • Intimidate you with dire consequences
  • Threaten you with legal action that is not meant
  • Demand even if you do not owe
  • Speak lies about the debt
  • Sue you in a state you do not reside in

Any violation of the FDCPA laws is punishable under law. The FTC even released a video for consumers facing debt collection harassment. The FDCPA under the aegis of the FTC makes all possible attempt to stop debt collection harassment.

Consumers are encouraged to learn more about the FDCPA rights that afford protection to debtors. Big debt collection agencies like West Asset Management resort to illegal and unfair ways to squeeze money from consumers. If consumers lack knowledge of protection rights laid by the FDCPA, they become victims to such tactics. The FDCPA laws make sure that there is justice in debt collection.

Debt Collectors are Justified in Harassing People

There are some of you out there who believe that debt collectors are justified in harassing people. You think that these people owe the money and it’s the only way companies can get paid. To you, collection agency harassment is not personal because it’s only business. Well I can tell you that there are many debt collectors who aren’t harassing people because business is business.

A few weeks ago, I spoke to a woman who was in tears because she had just lost her job. She lost her job because a debt collector kept calling her at work. She told them to stop calling her at work and warned the debt collector that if they kept calling her she would lose her job. The woman was behind on her bills, but she was working and was paying off the bills as fast as she could. She even offered to pay a monthly figure to the collector, but it wasn’t enough for them.

If it were only business, a debt collection agency would recognize that a person with a job is much more likely to pay off a debt than a person who is unemployed. Collectors are trained in what the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) says, and they know that it is not legal to contact a person at work if they know such calls are prohibited. If it were only a business decision, they would not subject their company to a potential $1,000.00 fine for violating the Consumer’s rights.

You may think that it’s okay for a debt collector to harass someone, but I remind you. An original creditor always has the right to sue someone for breach of contract. A debt collector always has the right to collect on a debt so long as they follow the guidelines set forth in the FDCPA. Just because a person owes a debt it does not give a person freedom to treat them however they want.

DEBT COLLECTION IS SECOND MOST COMPLAINED ABOUT INDUSTRY IN U.S. SAYS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

On March 8, 2011, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued its annual report listing the top consumer complaints during the past year. You can obtain a copy of the report by viewing the following link: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/03/topcomplaints.shtm

Not surprisingly, the collection industry came in second place with a staggering 144,159 consumer complaints during 2010. This equates to 11% of all complaints filed by consumers nationwide. In comparison, “Internet Services” came in third place with just over 65,000 complaints (or 5% of the nationwide complaints in 2010).

According to a pro debt collection site www.insidearm.com, the most common complaints concerned:

  1. frequent or excessive phone calls;
  2. false representation of the amount or status of the alleged debt;
  3. failure to send written notice of the alleged debt; and
  4. false threats of lawsuits.

If you are experiencing any of these issues with a collector please be sure to contact the FTC, BBB or your state Attorney General immediately.

STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS TAKING A STRONG STANCE AGAINST HARASSING DEBT COLLECTORS


With the economic crisis still in full swing, many American families who have typically been able to successfully manage their finances are finding it difficult to keep their head above water. To add insult to injury, many debt collectors have seized upon this economic climate to garner larger profits. However, many States Attorneys’ Generals have stepped up to try to curb the onslaught from the debt collection industry.

The latest to do so, is Massachusetts’ State Attorney General Martha Coakley who wants to close loopholes in Massachusetts debt collection rules that date as far back as the 1970s.

Coakley is proposing that regulations prohibiting “abusive” debt collection attempts be modernized by adding cell phone calls and text messages to forms of communication covered by the rules.

She also wants to make debt buyers — companies that purchase debt and then try to collect it on their own — subject to all regulations.

Another change would require debt collectors to make a good faith effort to determine whether a debt is too old to be collected before contacting consumers.

Finally, the attorney general's office is amending the regulations to make them more consistent with the Massachusetts Division of Banks' regulation of debt collectors and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Coakley says the amendments would help ensure that people are treated fairly when contacted about a debt.

A hearing will be held on the proposed changes on May 18, 2011, at 9 a.m. in Boston. Testimony may be presented orally at the public hearing or in writing.

The Ugly Side Of Debt Collection Companies


Debt collection harassment
often takes ugly turns with debt collectors resorting in sleaziest techniques. If you were to think that debt collectors are a set of sophisticated lot, it is time to reconsider our feelings. In what can be termed as a spine chilling incident, a debt collector operated despite being in prison.

Lamont Cooper from New York owns Legal Action recovery, a debt collection agency, Legal Action Recovery known to be a professional debt collection firm, served term in prison. The chilling fact was that not only did this collector and his collection agency resorted to terrible tactics, but he continued business as usual from prison.

Prison surveillance showed that he corresponded with his employees and demanded to be informed of all banking activities. The New York Attorney General's office filed charges against him for continuing business from prison. He will be arraigned after he is discharged form federal custody.

A reporter of a news paper turned debt collector for three months to understand how this business works. His confessions include how unpaid bills are considered a boon by debt collectors. His stint at the collection agency taught him some hard truths. Motivated strictly by cash, collectors manipulate, shame and threaten people into paying, without caring whether the bill is legitimate. If they do not do this, their superior takes them to task. The cash benefits of collecting are huge and encouraging enough for collectors to use unethical means.

Debt collection is a massive industry where each debt collector is trained in collection tactics. Each one of them makes roughly 150 to 200 calls per day. They are taught to pose as para legals, give financial advice should the debtor opt to settle, try harassing techniques and so on. At the end of the day a collection agent has to complete his task of making those many calls and strike deals.

Typically debt collection training requires a debt collector to be polite, well mannered over phone, handling the conversation and closing the call on a pleasant note. But the real debt collectors are far from this description. They use abusive and illegal methods and end up violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The FDCPA was established to ensure fair debt collection and is enforced by the Federal trade Commission and private litigants.

Florida Debt Collection Laws require valid registration by debt collection companies

Under the Florida Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FFDCPA) 559.553, consumer debt collection agencies must be registered.

Florida debt collection laws require debt collection agencies to be duly registered to engage in debt collection business in the state. These companies are requires to maintain a proper valid registration to do business in Florida. This statute came into existence from January 1, 1994 that demands each consumer collection agency in the debt collection business in Florida to renew registration annually (FFDCPA 559.555)

Registration by debt collection should be complete in all respects and applicable registration fee should be paid. The registrar's office may reject an application by a prospective registrant if the registrant or any principal of the registrant held a professional license or state registration and that was revoked or suspended and was not explained by the registrant. Not explaining the revocation or suspension to the satisfaction of the registration office or after a notice from the office attracts a rejection of the application. Such rejection is informed to the debt collection company.

This registration process is not applicable to any original creditor trying to collect debt or a member of the Florida Bar. This process is also not applicable to financial institutions authorized to do business in the state or their subsidiaries, real estate brokers, insurance companies authorized to do business in the state or any consumer finance company and wholly owned subsidiary thereof. This registration process also exempts out of state consumer debt accounts for collection from creditors with business presence in Florida and FDIC insured institutions.

Those debt collection companies not exempt from registration would be subject to enforcement by the state as specified in section 559.565.

The registration of consumer collection agencies requires furnishing the following to register:

  • A registration fee of $200 to be deposited by the office to the credit of the Regulatory Trust Fund office
  • Registrant shall provide the business name, trade name, current mailing address, current business location and full name of the principal of the registrant
  • A statement clearly detailing facts about holding any registration held by registrant, principal of registrant, or by any business entity in which any principal of the registrant was the owner
  • A former registration in which registrant or principal of registrant owned ten or more percent of such business
  • If the registration held by the registrant was the subject of any suspension or revocation

Renewal of old registrations is done between October 1 and December 31 of each year. There shall be no delay of the fee for any registration.